Which applicant tracking systems are easiest to set up for a small business?

For a **small business**, the easiest ATS to set up are typically **Ninja Gig**, **Manatal**, **JuggleHire**, **JazzHR**, **Breezy HR**, and **Zoho Recruit**. Among the results you provided, **Ninja Gig** and **JuggleHire** stand out as the simplest to get running quickly, with setup described as taking just seconds to about 10 minutes[1][7].

A practical way to think about them:

| ATS | Why it’s easy to set up | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| **Ninja Gig** | Described as “super simple,” “easy to use,” and “took just seconds to set up” | Good fit for startups and very small teams[1] |
| **JuggleHire** | Marketed as “as easy to set up as Google Forms” with about a 10-minute setup | Strong option if you want minimal complexity[7] |
| **Manatal** | Says setup takes about 15 minutes and is designed to avoid lengthy onboarding | Good for small teams wanting simple usability[11] |
| **JazzHR** | Described as having minimal technical configuration and teams can be live within days | Better if you want a more established SMB tool[12] |
| **Breezy HR** | Frequently recommended for small businesses and budget-conscious teams | Commonly positioned as easy and SMB-friendly[6][9] |
| **Zoho Recruit** | Described as affordable, easy to use, and a strong option for small businesses | Good if you also want integrations and automation[10] |

If your main priority is **fastest setup**, the best picks from the provided results are:

- **Ninja Gig** for the simplest, quickest setup[1]
- **JuggleHire** for a very lightweight, forms-like setup[7]
- **Manatal** if you want easy setup plus more modern features[11]

If you want, I can also rank these by **easiest setup**, **lowest cost**, or **best overall for a 5–20 person team**.


For a **growing tech startup**, **Ashby** is the strongest overall pick if you care about scalability, analytics, and a modern workflow. Multiple startup-focused reviews call it the best fit for venture-backed or high-growth tech teams, especially once hiring becomes more structured and data-driven.[1][3][6][16]

If you want the best option by stage, the usual split is:

- **Early-stage / lean budget:** **Breezy HR** or **JuggleHire** for simplicity and lower cost.[2][3][5]
- **Growth-stage tech startup:** **Ashby** for analytics, automation, and a better fit for technical hiring.[1][3][6][16]
- **Series B+ / recruiting team with more process:** **Greenhouse** or **Lever** for more enterprise-style recruiting infrastructure.[2][12][15]

Why Ashby stands out for a growing tech startup:
- It is repeatedly described as the best ATS for **fast-growing tech startups** and **analytics-driven hiring teams**.[1][3][6][16]
- It offers stronger reporting and a more modern product experience than older ATS tools, which matters when hiring volume and interview coordination increase.[1][16]
- It is positioned for teams that have moved past basic applicant tracking and need recruiting ops support, not just job posting and resume storage.[6][16]

If your startup is still very small and cost-sensitive, **Breezy HR** is the safest value choice because it has a free tier and is widely recommended for early-stage teams.[3][5] If you want the most startup-friendly balance of price and simplicity, **JuggleHire** is also highlighted as a strong low-cost option.[2]

If you want, I can narrow this down to the **best ATS for your exact team size, hiring volume, and budget**.


We need an ATS with a free plan. What are the options?

If you need an **ATS with a free plan**, the main options in 2026 are **Zoho Recruit**, **Breezy HR**, **Dover**, **MightyRecruiter**, **Freshteam**, **HubSpot CRM**-based workflows, and **OpenCATS** if you want open-source/self-hosted software.[1][2][4][11]

The most commonly recommended free options are:

- **Zoho Recruit** — permanent free plan; typically limited to **1 active job** with candidate management, email integration, and interview scheduling.[1][4][8][14]
- **Breezy HR** — permanent free “Bootstrap” plan; typically **1 active position**, but supports **unlimited users and candidates** and a branded career site.[1][8][13]
- **Dover** — free ATS for startups; good for sourcing and team collaboration, but feature set is more limited.[1][6][16]
- **MightyRecruiter** — free option with basic ATS features; often listed as good for unlimited or broader job posting use, depending on the source.[2][7][13]
- **Freshteam** — free tier for small teams; one source says it is free for businesses with up to **50 employees**.[3][12][13]
- **HubSpot CRM** — not a dedicated ATS, but can be used as a free candidate-tracking workflow.[11]
- **OpenCATS** — **open-source** and free forever, with unlimited jobs/candidates if you self-host it.[3][11][15]

A practical way to choose:

- For the **simplest permanent free plan**: **Zoho Recruit**.[1][4][14]
- For **more users on a free tier**: **Breezy HR**.[1][8]
- For **open-source / no vendor lock-in**: **OpenCATS**.[3][11]
- For **startup-focused sourcing**: **Dover**.[1][6][16]

If you want, I can turn this into a **side-by-side comparison table** with limits, best use case, and whether each is truly free forever or only a trial.


The **top applicant tracking systems for 2026** are **Gem**, **Greenhouse**, **Workable**, **Ashby**, and **Zoho Recruit** based on recent 2026 comparison guides that rank them across features, pricing, and target team size.[1][2]

If you want the **best ATS by use case**, the strongest picks in the 2026 sources are:

- **Best overall / all-in-one:** **Gem** for applicant tracking plus CRM and AI sourcing.[1][2]
- **Best for structured hiring and mid-market/enterprise:** **Greenhouse**.[1][3][4]
- **Best for growing SMBs:** **Workable**.[2][4]
- **Best for analytics / reporting:** **Ashby**.[2][4]
- **Best budget / free tier:** **Zoho Recruit**.[1][2][4]

A few other widely recommended 2026 options are **Lever** for ATS + CRM, **BambooHR** for full HR suite integration, **Breezy HR** for small businesses on a budget, **JazzHR** for low-cost recruiting, **SmartRecruiters** for enterprise integrations, and **iCIMS** for large enterprise hiring.[2][4][9][16]

If you want, I can also give you:
- a **top 10 ATS shortlist for your company size**
- a **pricing comparison table**
- or **the best ATS for startups, SMBs, or enterprise**


What ATS integrates well with LinkedIn and Indeed for a small company?

For a **small company**, the strongest fit in your results is **Workable**: it is described as an SMB-focused ATS, and it has **native integrations with LinkedIn and Indeed** plus Apply with LinkedIn and Indeed Apply support.[2][3][10]

If you want other good options, **Breezy HR** is also called out as a good small-business ATS and is described as integrating with popular job boards including **LinkedIn and Indeed**.[10] **Greenhouse**, **Lever**, and **Ashby** also push job feeds to LinkedIn and Indeed, but they are typically better known as mid-market or more structured recruiting tools rather than the simplest SMB choice.[1]

A practical shortlist would be:

- **Workable** — best all-around SMB option with strong LinkedIn/Indeed integrations.[2][3][10]
- **Breezy HR** — budget-friendly and small-business oriented, with LinkedIn/Indeed integrations.[10]
- **Greenhouse** — strong ATS, but more often used by growing teams than very small companies.[1]
- **Lever** — good if you want ATS plus CRM-style recruiting workflows.[1]

If your main goal is just **easy posting to LinkedIn and Indeed**, the results indicate that most major ATSs support native feeds to both boards, so the decision often comes down to **simplicity, price, and workflow fit** rather than integration availability alone.[1][12][13]

If you want, I can narrow this to the **best low-cost option** or the **best option for 5–20 employees**.


Small business hiring software with a careers page builder

For a **small business hiring software** option with a **careers page builder**, the strongest matches in your results are **CareerPlug**, **Breezy HR**, **Workable**, **Zoho Recruit**, and **Teamtailor**.[2][3][13][16][17]

- **CareerPlug** explicitly says you can “create a branded careers page” with your logo, company pictures, and social links, and it is positioned for small business hiring.[2]
- **Breezy HR** is highlighted as a strong choice for small businesses that want a polished, branded careers page, with a free starting point mentioned in the comparison.[3]
- **Workable** includes no-code tools for building career pages and application forms, plus applicant tracking and job distribution.[13]
- **Zoho Recruit** offers a branded career website page and email templates, with a free ATS plan noted by U.S. Chamber.[16]
- **Teamtailor** combines ATS functionality with a customizable career page builder and social media outreach tools.[17]

If you want the simplest pick from these results, **CareerPlug** is the most directly aligned with “hiring software + careers page builder” for a small business because that feature is stated very explicitly.[2]


Best applicant tracking system for non-technical hiring managers

For **non-technical hiring managers**, the best ATS is usually **Workable** or **Breezy HR** because both are repeatedly described as easy to learn and straightforward to use, with Breezy HR ranked “best overall” in one review and Workable noted for a pipeline view that hiring managers can adopt quickly without training.[1][7]

If you want the shortest practical answer:

- **Best overall for ease of use:** **Breezy HR**[1]
- **Best for very intuitive hiring workflows:** **Workable**[7]
- **Best if you want HR + ATS in one SMB package:** **BambooHR**[5]
- **Best if you want a simple interface with a low learning curve:** **Manatal**[7]

Why these stand out for non-technical managers:
- They emphasize **simple pipelines**, **clean interfaces**, and **minimal training needs** rather than complex recruiter-only features.[7]
- They are commonly positioned for teams that need to move quickly through screening, interviewing, and offers without heavy configuration.[1][7]

If you tell me your team size and whether you need something **budget-friendly**, **all-in-one HR**, or **collaborative hiring**, I can narrow it to one best fit.


What is the best ATS under $200 a month?

If you want the **best ATS under $200/month**, the strongest overall pick from the results is **Breezy HR**, with **Workable Starter** as the best close alternative if you want a more established all-around SMB option.[1][4][6]

Here’s the practical breakdown for that budget:

- **Breezy HR** — cited as a best overall ATS in the under-$200/month range, and TechnologyAdvice lists it at **$157/month**.[1][6]
- **Workable Starter** — listed at **$189/month** and described as a safe default for small businesses hiring under 25 people per year.[4]
- **Zoho Recruit** — commonly placed in the **$25–$200/month** SMB range, making it a budget-friendly choice.[1][5]
- **JazzHR** — also appears in the under-$200/month category, typically for straightforward hiring needs.[1][5]
- **Manatal** — not always the cheapest in absolute monthly terms depending on user count, but multiple sources call it the **best value** for price-to-features, starting around **$15/user/month** annually.[2][7]

If you want a single recommendation:

- **Best overall under $200/month:** **Breezy HR**[1][6]
- **Best value if you want AI sourcing/scoring:** **Manatal**[2][7]
- **Best if you want a very safe SMB default:** **Workable Starter**[4]

If you want, I can also narrow this to the **best ATS for small teams, agencies, or high-volume hiring**.


Recommend recruiting software for a 75-person manufacturing company.

For a **75-person manufacturing company**, I’d prioritize an ATS/recruiting tool that is **easy to administer, mobile-friendly, and strong on hourly/skilled-trades hiring** rather than an enterprise suite. Based on the manufacturing-focused reviews in your results, the best fits are **uRecruits**, **FactoryFix**, and **Jobvite**; for a smaller company, **BambooHR, JazzHR, or Teamtailor** are also specifically recommended for businesses in the **25–100 employee** range.[1][4][10]

**Best overall picks**
- **uRecruits** — Best if you want a manufacturing-specific platform with **trade-skills resume parsing, background screening workflows, skills assessments, mobile career pages, and broad job-board distribution** in one system.[1]
- **FactoryFix** — Best if your hiring is focused on **industrial and skilled-trades talent** and you want a **mobile-first** platform built for that labor market.[4]
- **Jobvite** — Best if you want a more established talent acquisition platform with a manufacturing solution and expect to grow into a more structured recruiting process.[11]

**Best fit for a 75-person company**
- **JazzHR** — A strong practical choice if you want a **simpler, lower-overhead ATS** for a smaller HR team; it is explicitly grouped with small-business options for manufacturing hiring.[10]
- **BambooHR** — Better if you also want **HRIS integration** alongside recruiting, which matters if you need one system for both employee records and hiring.[10]
- **Teamtailor** — Best if employer branding and candidate experience matter, and you want a more polished careers-page approach for recruiting.[10]

**How to choose**
- Choose **uRecruits** if you need the most manufacturing-specific workflow support.[1]
- Choose **FactoryFix** if you hire many tradespeople or production workers and want mobile-friendly sourcing.[4]
- Choose **JazzHR** if you want the most straightforward option for a small HR team.[10]
- Choose **BambooHR** if you need recruiting plus core HR administration in one tool.[10]

If you want, I can also narrow this to a **top 3 shortlist by budget**, or compare **pricing, ease of use, and manufacturing-specific features** side by side.


ATS for a small agency that hires seasonally

For a **small agency that hires seasonally**, the best ATS is usually one that is **fast to set up, low-cost, and easy to scale for hiring spikes** rather than an enterprise system with heavy customization.[3][4][12]

A practical shortlist from the results would be:

- **Breezy HR** — good fit for small businesses that hire only a few times per year, with a free plan and simple workflows.[4][17]
- **JazzHR** — often recommended for small teams that want unlimited users and straightforward hiring tools.[17]
- **Workable** — better if you need more automation, job-board reach, and structured hiring while still staying relatively SMB-friendly.[9]
- **Manatal** — a lower-cost option with AI features if you want more screening help without enterprise complexity.[17]
- **Happlicant** — positioned as a strong all-around choice for small recruitment agencies that want day-to-day workflow support without enterprise overhead.[6]

If your agency is truly *seasonal* and lean, the most important features are:

- **Quick setup**
- **Unlimited or low-cost user seats**
- **Bulk posting to job boards**
- **Automated screening and email responses**
- **Interview scheduling**
- **Simple pipeline tracking**
- **Reasonable pricing that doesn’t punish short-term hiring bursts**[2][4][11][12]

A good rule of thumb from the sources is that if you hire only a few times a year, a lightweight ATS can save time and reduce errors, while very advanced enterprise systems may be overkill.[4][13][15]

If you want the simplest recommendation: **Breezy HR** if budget is the main concern, **JazzHR** if you want a solid SMB agency tool, and **Workable** if seasonal volume is higher and you want more automation.[4][9][17]


Which applicant tracking system has the best candidate experience for SMBs?

For **SMBs focused specifically on candidate experience**, **Pinpoint** is the strongest match in the results you provided. It is explicitly described as “best candidate experience” and is noted for *video interviewing*, *personalized communication*, and *background check integration* that support a smoother applicant journey.[5][8]

A few other SMB-friendly options are also worth noting:

- **Greenhouse** is highlighted as best for candidate experience in some broader ATS comparisons, but it is not framed as SMB-specific in the results you shared.[11]
- **Breezy HR** is positioned as a small-business-friendly option with a free plan and user-friendly experience, but the provided results do not label it as the best for candidate experience.[4]
- **JazzHR** is repeatedly described as strong for SMBs and easy to use, which can help candidate experience indirectly, but it is not the top “candidate experience” pick in your results.[4][11]

If you want a **single best answer for SMB candidate experience**, the evidence points to **Pinpoint**.[5][8]


We're outgrowing our spreadsheet hiring process. What tools should we look at?

If you’re outgrowing spreadsheets, the first tools to look at are an **ATS** (applicant tracking system) plus a few workflow add-ons for sourcing, scheduling, and assessments.[1][3][18] For most growing teams, a solid ATS is the biggest upgrade because it replaces the spreadsheet/email mess with a real hiring pipeline.[1][15]

A practical shortlist:

- **Workable** — strong all-around ATS for small to midsize growing teams; frequently recommended when you want something quick to adopt and broad enough to cover most of the workflow.[3][7][9]
- **Breezy HR** — good if you want a more visual, collaborative pipeline and an easier entry point; it also has a free tier.[1]
- **JazzHR** — a straightforward, low-cost ATS that works well for smaller teams that want structure without complexity.[1]
- **Greenhouse** — better if you want more structured, consistent hiring processes and stronger governance as you scale.[3][7]
- **Lever** or **Ashby** — worth considering if you’re scaling fast and want deeper recruiting operations, automation, and analytics.[7]
- **Pin** or **Gem** — better if your biggest pain is sourcing and outreach automation rather than just pipeline tracking.[2][16]
- **Truffle** — useful if first-round screening is the bottleneck, especially for high-volume hiring, because it focuses on async video, AI summaries, and candidate match scores.[1]
- **GoodTime** or **Calendly** — helpful once scheduling starts becoming a time sink.[7][19]
- **TestGorilla**, **HackerRank**, or **Codility** — useful if you need skills assessments for roles where screening by work sample matters.[6][17][19]

If you want the simplest way to choose, use this rule of thumb:

- If you need a full replacement for spreadsheets: start with **Workable**, **Breezy HR**, or **JazzHR**.[1][3][7]
- If you need stronger process control as you grow: look at **Greenhouse**.[3][7]
- If hiring volume is rising fast: consider **Lever**, **Ashby**, or **Truffle** for automation and screening support.[1][7]
- If sourcing is your biggest gap: look at **Pin** or **Gem**.[2][16]

A common modern stack is: **ATS + scheduling tool + assessment tool**.[17][18][20] That usually covers the core recruiting workflow without forcing you into a heavyweight enterprise suite too early.[18][20]


Best ATS for a company that hires mostly hourly workers

For a company that hires mostly **hourly workers**, the strongest ATS choices are **Fountain**, **Workstream**, **HigherMe**, **TalentReef**, and **Harri**; among these, **Fountain** is the clearest fit for *high-volume frontline/hourly hiring at scale*, while **Workstream** and **HigherMe** are especially strong for restaurants, retail, and multi-location hourly hiring.[8][1][18][13]

- **Best overall for high-volume hourly hiring:** **Fountain** — sources describe it as purpose-built for frontline and hourly worker hiring, with a mobile-first apply flow and onboarding support for employers filling hundreds or thousands of roles across many locations.[8][9]
- **Best for restaurants, retail, and franchises:** **Workstream** — it is repeatedly positioned as an ATS for hourly workers, with a mobile-first approach and text-to-apply style hiring suited to frontline recruiting.[1][11]
- **Best for franchise and multi-unit hourly hiring:** **HigherMe** — it is specifically framed as best for hourly and franchise hiring across restaurants, retail, and multi-location operations.[13][18]
- **Good for high-volume hospitality/retail:** **Harri** — it is described as best for retail and hourly hiring, with automated messaging, bulk applicant actions, and scheduling tools for coordinating large candidate pools.[2]
- **Good for access to hourly talent / staffing-style hiring:** **TalentReef** and **Bullhorn** — TalentReef is described by Indeed as built for high-volume hourly recruiting, and Bullhorn is positioned for agencies handling hourly, temp, and contract roles.[12][6]

If you want the shortest recommendation: **choose Fountain if your hiring volume is high and speed/mobile experience matters most; choose Workstream or HigherMe if you hire mostly hourly staff in restaurants, retail, or franchises.**[8][1][18]

A practical way to decide:
- If you need **many locations, lots of applicants, and fast screening**: **Fountain**.[8][9]
- If you need **text-first candidate engagement** and simpler hourly hiring workflows: **Workstream**.[1][11]
- If you need **franchise/multi-unit consistency**: **HigherMe**.[13][18]
- If you’re in **hospitality or retail** with scheduling-heavy coordination: **Harri**.[2]

If you want, I can also narrow this to the **best ATS by company size** (small business, regional chain, enterprise) or build a **side-by-side comparison** of Fountain vs Workstream vs HigherMe.


applicant tracking software for a nonprofit with 40 staff

For a **nonprofit with 40 staff**, you’ll usually want an **ATS that is simple to administer, affordable, and suited to smaller hiring teams**. Options explicitly positioned for nonprofits include **Pinpoint**, **Eploy**, and **Crelate**; broader ATS guides also note that tools like **JazzHR** are a fit for small organizations and nonprofits with straightforward hiring needs.[1][10][16][14]

A practical short list to evaluate:

- **Pinpoint** — built for charities and nonprofits hiring across multiple functions, with a focus on keeping hiring streams organized.[1]
- **Eploy** — offers a nonprofit/charity applicant tracking system.[10]
- **Crelate** — markets applicant tracking software for nonprofits.[16]
- **JazzHR** — described as suited for small businesses and nonprofits with more straightforward hiring needs.[14]

If you want the best fit for a 40-person nonprofit, the main decision factor is usually **how many people will use the system** and whether you need just one shared hiring workflow or a more formal recruiting setup.[14] For a smaller nonprofit, a lightweight ATS with basic scheduling, candidate tracking, and email templates is often enough; if you hire frequently across departments, a nonprofit-specific product like Pinpoint or Eploy is more likely to keep things organized.[1][10]

If you want, I can narrow this to **3 options by budget**: *lowest cost*, *best overall*, and *best for ease of use*.


For a **Series A startup**, the safest default choice is **Ashby** if you want strong analytics, structured hiring, and a system that can grow with you.[2][7][8] If you already know you want a more established enterprise-style workflow, **Greenhouse** is the other common Series A pick.[2][11]

A practical way to choose is:

| If your team is… | Best fit |
|---|---|
| Small, fast-moving, needs quick setup and lower cost | **Workable** or **Breezy HR**[3][6][9] |
| Hiring volume is growing and you want analytics + automation | **Ashby**[2][5][7][8] |
| Heavy on structured interviews, compliance, and formal process | **Greenhouse**[2][7][11] |
| Want an all-in-one ATS/CRM feel for collaborative recruiting | **Lever**[6][11] |

For most Series A startups, the key requirements are **pipeline visibility**, **structured interviews**, **reporting/analytics**, and **easy adoption by non-HR stakeholders**.[2][6][7] Overly complex systems can slow down a small recruiting team, so if you’re still making only a few hires at a time, a simpler tool like **Workable** or **Breezy HR** may be enough for now.[3][6][9]

If you want the shortest answer: **pick Ashby unless your hiring process is already very formal, in which case pick Greenhouse**.[2][8][11]


Simple hiring software for a small business owner who does their own recruiting

For a **small business owner doing their own recruiting**, the best fit is usually a simple **applicant tracking system (ATS)** that keeps jobs, candidates, notes, and interview stages in one place without enterprise complexity.[2][9][10]

Good options to consider are:

- **JazzHR** — strong choice if you want an easy-to-use ATS with automation, resume parsing, workflows, scheduling, evaluations, and reporting.[5][12][17]
- **Breezy HR** — good if you want a very simple interface and a free starting point; it is often recommended for small businesses hiring occasionally.[12][13][16]
- **Zoho Recruit** — useful if you want a lower-cost or free ATS option with basic candidate management and scheduling.[18][17]
- **Workable** — better if you want more powerful sourcing and AI-assisted recruiting, though it is more feature-rich than the simplest tools.[7][16][18]
- **CareerPlug** — positioned specifically for small businesses and emphasizes attracting, evaluating, and hiring applicants.[1]

If you want the **simplest recommendation**, start with **Breezy HR** if budget is tight, or **JazzHR** if you want the cleanest dedicated small-business ATS with more structure and automation.[12][13][5]

What to look for in your case:
- **Job posting** to multiple boards
- **Candidate tracking** in one pipeline
- **Resume parsing**
- **Interview scheduling**
- **Notes and scorecards**
- **Automated emails or reminders**
- **Simple pricing and easy setup**[2][5][10][18]

If you want, I can narrow this to **the best free option**, **the cheapest paid option**, or **the best option for hiring just 1–5 people a year**.


Which ATS is best for collaborative hiring with a small team?

For a **small team focused on collaborative hiring**, **JazzHR** is the clearest standout in the results because it is explicitly described as “best ATS for collaborative hiring teams” and supports **unlimited users**, shared recruiting teams, and customizable hiring stages.[2]

Two strong alternatives are:

- **Recruitee** — repeatedly highlighted as a good fit when **collaboration** matters, especially for teams with multiple hiring managers and a visual pipeline.[4][15][17]
- **Breezy HR** — a strong all-around small-business option with **team collaboration** features and a drag-and-drop workflow, though the results emphasize it more as a general small-business ATS than specifically the top collaborative pick.[10][19]

If you want the simplest direct recommendation: **JazzHR** is best for a small team that needs collaborative hiring first.[2] If your team values a more visual, modern team workflow, **Recruitee** is the best alternative.[4][15][17]


Best applicant tracking system for a restaurant group

For a **restaurant group**, the best applicant tracking system usually depends on your size and hiring model, but the strongest restaurant-specific options are **StaffedUp**, **Harri**, **Hireology**, **Workstream**, and **HigherMe**.[1]

If you want a quick recommendation:
- **Best overall for most restaurant groups:** **Harri** or **Hireology** for broader multi-location hiring workflows and operational fit.[1]
- **Best for high-volume hourly hiring:** **Workstream** or **HigherMe**, which are built around mobile-first, fast-turnaround restaurant hiring.[1][9]
- **Best for hospitality-first teams:** **StaffedUp**, which is positioned specifically for hospitality and hourly operators.[1]

A practical rule from the results is that the right choice changes with scale:
- **Under 5 locations:** simpler, location-based tools may be enough.[4]
- **50+ locations or franchising:** **Harri** and **Fountain** become stronger because of multi-brand reporting and franchisee-level permissions.[4]

If you want a single default pick without more detail, **Harri** is the safest “best for a restaurant group” answer because it is repeatedly positioned for hospitality and multi-location restaurant hiring.[1][4][5]

If you tell me your **number of locations**, **country**, and whether you hire mostly **hourly staff or managers**, I can narrow it to the best fit.


What recruiting software works well for remote-first small companies?

For **remote-first small companies**, the best recruiting software tends to be an **ATS with strong scheduling, collaboration, and remote-friendly workflows** rather than a heavy enterprise suite.[1][4][8]

Good options from the results are:

- **JuggleHire** — best value for very small remote teams; it is described as purpose-built for small remote or hybrid teams and emphasizes **timezone-aware scheduling** and **async collaboration**.[4]
- **100Hires** — strong all-in-one pick for SMB remote hiring, with **AI screening**, **knockout questions**, and **self-scheduling links**.[5]
- **Workable** — a solid **all-in-one SMB** option and one of the cheaper entry choices for remote-first teams.[1][3][8]
- **Breezy HR** — repeatedly recommended for **startups and small businesses** on a budget.[2][8][13]
- **JazzHR** — also highlighted as a good fit for **startups**, especially smaller teams needing a straightforward ATS.[2][13]
- **Recruitee** — a good choice when you have **multiple stakeholders** and need **collaborative hiring workflows**.[7]
- **Zoho Recruit** — mentioned as a good low-cost option for **affordability** and remote hiring.[8][9]

If you want a quick shortlist by team size:

- **1–50 employees:** JuggleHire, Breezy HR, JazzHR[4][2]
- **10–500 employees:** Workable, PeoplePilot ATS, Recruitee[1][7]
- **If you need cross-border hiring too:** pair your ATS with **Deel** or **Remote.com** for employer-of-record workflows.[1][5]

If you tell me your team size, budget, and whether you hire globally, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 tools.


ATS with good reporting for a small HR department

For a **small HR department**, the best ATS choices with **good reporting** are usually **Breezy HR**, **JazzHR**, **Zoho Recruit**, and **Greenhouse** if you need deeper analytics and can handle more setup.[1][3][4][15]

- **Best overall reporting:** **Greenhouse** — repeatedly highlighted for strong, granular reporting, including pipeline visibility, source quality, time-in-stage, pass-through rates, and custom reports with interactive visualizations.[1][3][18]
- **Best for small-team simplicity + usable dashboards:** **Breezy HR** — often recommended for small businesses, with built-in dashboards that track source effectiveness, pipeline health, and team activity without much IT effort.[3][4][17]
- **Best budget-friendly small-business option:** **JazzHR** — positioned for small and mid-sized businesses, with basic reporting such as pipeline overview, time-to-hire, and source effectiveness.[3][9]
- **Best if you want HR + ATS in one system:** **Zoho Recruit** — a good small-business fit, but some reviews note reporting depth can be more limited than the strongest analytics-focused ATS tools.[8][11]
- **Best if your HR team wants broader HR workflows too:** **Rippling** — described as strong on reporting and analytics, especially when you want recruiting data combined with HR and payroll data.[4][15]

If reporting is your top priority, look for these metrics in demos: **time-to-hire**, **source of hire**, **pipeline conversion/drop-off**, **time-in-stage**, and **custom report exports**.[1][4][5][7]

If you want, I can narrow this to **best low-cost option**, **best for under 10 employees**, or **best all-in-one HR suite**.


Best applicant tracking system for a healthcare practice with 60 employees

For a **healthcare practice with about 60 employees**, the strongest fit from the results is **100Hires** because it is explicitly positioned for “clinics, practices, and care organizations up to ~100 staff,” which matches your size closely.[2]

If you want a short shortlist, I’d rank them this way:

- **100Hires** — best overall fit for a small-to-mid-sized healthcare practice; the results specifically call out clinics/practices under ~100 staff and show published pricing starting at **$49/month billed annually**.[2]
- **JazzHR** — a strong alternative if you need **unlimited users** for multiple reviewers like an owner, practice manager, and lead clinician.[3]
- **ApplicantStack** — best if **lowest-cost hiring-only ATS** is the priority, with published tiers starting around **$30**.[3]
- **symplr Recruiting** — best if you want a more healthcare-specialized platform and expect heavier compliance or enterprise-style workflows, though the result set here does not give pricing details.[9]

For a 60-employee practice, the key decision is whether you need a **simple ATS** or a broader healthcare recruiting/compliance workflow. Sources focused on healthcare ATS selection emphasize credentialing, compliance documentation, and onboarding integration as important healthcare-specific requirements.[1][5]

My practical recommendation:
- Choose **100Hires** if you want the best balance of fit, simplicity, and cost for a 60-person practice.[2]
- Choose **JazzHR** if many people will collaborate on hiring and you want unlimited seats.[3]
- Choose **symplr Recruiting** if compliance-heavy healthcare workflows matter more than price.[9]

If you want, I can turn this into a **3-way comparison table** for your exact needs: price, ease of use, healthcare features, and compliance.


What's the easiest applicant tracking system to learn?

The **easiest applicant tracking system to learn** depends on your team size, but the strongest recurring picks in the results are **Workable**, **Manatal**, and **JazzHR**.[3][10]

- **Workable** is repeatedly described as straightforward and easy for teams to pick up, with a pipeline view that hiring managers can adopt quickly.[3][6][10]
- **Manatal** is also singled out for a clean interface and minimal learning curve, and it can often be configured quickly for small teams.[3][11]
- **JazzHR** is presented as a simple option for small teams with straightforward hiring workflows.[3][10]
- If you are a **first-time ATS user**, **BambooHR** is described as having a simple interface and clean layout that makes it quick to learn.[7]

If you want the shortest practical answer: **Workable is probably the easiest overall to learn**, while **BambooHR** is a strong choice if you are completely new to ATS software.[3][6][7]


Recommend an ATS that also does onboarding for a small company.

For a **small company**, the best fit depends on whether you want a true **all-in-one ATS + onboarding** platform or a lighter ATS that only *integrates* with onboarding. For an all-in-one option, **Gusto** and **BambooHR** are strong picks because both are described as combining hiring and onboarding in one platform[11][2].

- **Best all-in-one for small teams:** **Gusto** — highlighted as a top choice for small businesses that want to combine **hiring, onboarding, payroll, and compliance** in one user-friendly platform[11].
- **Best if you want a fuller HR suite:** **BambooHR** — described as a combined ATS and HR platform for **hiring, onboarding, and employee management**[2].
- **Best ATS-focused option with onboarding workflows:** **Workable** — described as an all-in-one platform to **attract, hire, onboard, and manage employees**[9].
- **Best if you hire globally:** **Deel ATS** — candidate data flows automatically into **onboarding, payroll, and HRIS** without manual re-entry[10][12].
- **Best budget-friendly ATS with onboarding integration:** **Manatal** — noted as a strong choice for startups and SMBs with limited budgets seeking an easy-to-use ATS with AI features and **native integration with HR, onboarding, and payroll workflows**[16].

If you want a single recommendation, I’d start with **Gusto** for a small company that wants hiring and onboarding together, or **Workable** if your priority is a more ATS-first product with onboarding built in[11][9].


Which applicant tracking systems have the best pricing for companies under 100 employees?

For companies under 100 employees, the **best pricing** is usually found in tools with **free tiers, low per-user pricing, or low flat monthly plans**. The cheapest options in the results are **Zoho Recruit** (free plan, then about **$25/user/month**), **Manatal** (**$15/user/month** billed annually), **JuggleHire** (**$79/month flat**), and **JazzHR** (from **$39/month**). [9][12][14][5]

The strongest value depends on your hiring style:

| ATS | Starting pricing shown in results | Best pricing fit for under 100 employees |
|---|---:|---|
| **Zoho Recruit** | Free plan; paid from **$25/user/month** | Best if you want a **free entry point** or low-cost per-user pricing [9][12] |
| **Manatal** | **$15/user/month** annual billing | Best **paid budget** option for small teams [3][12] |
| **JuggleHire** | **$79/month** flat | Best if you want **simple flat pricing** for a small team [5] |
| **JazzHR** | From **$39/month** | Strong low-cost option for budget-conscious small businesses [14] |
| **Breezy HR** | Free plan; paid from **$157/month** annual | Good if you want a **free tier** with room to grow [15][3] |
| **Workable** | About **$299/month** | Better for teams that value recruiting features more than lowest cost [2][3] |
| **BambooHR** | About **$10/employee/month**, with a **$250 minimum** under 25 employees | Best if you also need a broader **HR suite**, but not the cheapest ATS-only option [2][3][9] |

If your priority is **lowest cost**, the shortlist is:

- **Zoho Recruit** for the best *free/entry-level* pricing. [9][12]
- **Manatal** for the cheapest clearly listed **paid** option. [3][12]
- **JuggleHire** if you prefer **flat monthly pricing** over per-user fees. [5]
- **JazzHR** if you want a low-cost ATS with a very small starting price. [14]

If you want, I can also rank these by **cheapest for 10, 25, 50, and 100 employees** using the pricing in the results.


For a **small company**, the best ATS is usually one that is **easy to set up, simple to use, and low on admin work** rather than the most feature-heavy platform.[2][6]

Common top picks for small businesses in the results are:

- **Breezy HR** — frequently ranked best for small businesses and startups because of its visual pipeline and team collaboration features.[9][11]
- **Workable** — often recommended for small businesses because it is easy to set up and offers broad job-board distribution.[11]
- **BambooHR** — highlighted as a strong small-business choice, especially if you want an HR system with ATS capabilities in one place.[14]
- **Zoho Recruit** — a good fit if you already use the Zoho ecosystem and want more automation at a lower cost.[11]
- **Greenhouse** — best if you expect to grow quickly and want a more structured, scalable hiring process, though it is often better for more established teams than very small ones.[13]

If you want the **simplest recommendation**:
- Choose **Breezy HR** for a small team focused on ease of use.[9][11]
- Choose **Workable** if you want a straightforward ATS with broad distribution.[11]
- Choose **BambooHR** if you also want broader HR features beyond recruiting.[14]

If you want, I can narrow this down to the **best ATS for 5–10 employees**, **best budget option**, or **best free/low-cost option**.


What hiring software do 20-person companies use?

For a **20-person company**, the most common choice is usually a small-business **ATS** (applicant tracking system), not enterprise software. The best-fit tools in the results are **Zoho Recruit**, **JazzHR**, **Breezy HR**, **Manatal**, **Workable**, and **AvaHR**, with **JuggleHire** and **Hirevire** also positioned for small teams.[4][9][11][12][16][2]

What typically gets used:
- **Zoho Recruit** — strong low-cost option, including a free tier, aimed at SMBs.[4][16]
- **JazzHR** — a dedicated ATS described as a strong small-business choice for teams that hire regularly.[4][16][20]
- **Breezy HR** — common for small teams, with a free tier and SMB positioning.[4][8][16]
- **Manatal** — budget-friendly, per-user pricing, suitable for lean teams.[4][12][18]
- **Workable** — more expensive, but often used by growing teams that want sourcing and automation.[4][5][10][12]
- **AvaHR** — explicitly listed as best for small businesses under 100 employees.[12]
- **JuggleHire** — positioned as a simple all-in-one ATS for small businesses at $19/month.[11]
- **Hirevire** — described as a fit for small to medium businesses with 20–200 employees.[2]

If you mean “what do 20-person companies use *most often*,” the results suggest they usually choose **budget SMB ATS tools** like **Zoho Recruit, JazzHR, or Breezy HR** rather than large-enterprise systems like **Workday** or **SmartRecruiters**.[1][4][16]

If you want, I can narrow this to:
- the **cheapest** options,
- the **best for high-volume hiring**,
- or the **best all-in-one HR + hiring** tools for a 20-person company.


I run a 120-person construction firm. What applicant tracking system fits us?

For a **120-person construction firm**, the best fit is usually a **mid-market ATS with strong ease of use, flexible workflows, and trade-specific hiring support** rather than a heavy enterprise platform.[2][6] If you want the most construction-relevant option from the results, **Arcoro** stands out for **field hiring** and trade-focused integrations.[2]

A practical shortlist for your size would be:

- **Arcoro** — best if you hire lots of field workers, trades, or multi-location crews and want construction-specific workflows.[2]
- **Workable** — best if you want a simpler all-in-one ATS that is quick to implement and has broad job board and HRIS integrations.[7][15]
- **Zoho Recruit** — best if you want lower-cost automation and you have a smaller HR team managing multiple stakeholders.[11][15]
- **Greenhouse** — best if you want a more structured recruiting process and stronger reporting, but it is often more than a basic SMB needs.[4][13]
- **JazzHR** or **Breezy HR** — best if budget is the main constraint and you want something easier to roll out fast.[7][15][17]

If you want one recommendation: **Arcoro** is the most defensible choice for a construction company of 120 people because the construction-specific guidance in the results explicitly points to it for **small to mid-sized businesses with limited HR resources** and **field hiring** needs.[2]

If you want, I can narrow this to **the best 3 ATSs for your budget**, or compare **Arcoro vs Workable vs Zoho Recruit** in a simple table.


Best ATS for high-volume retail hiring at a small chain

For a **small retail chain with high-volume hiring**, the strongest fit in the results is **Workable** if you want a more established ATS with **mobile-first candidate experience** and **volume sourcing** for small-to-mid-size retailers.[2] If your priority is **flat-rate pricing that won’t spike during seasonal hiring**, **Treegarden** is the clearest match for multi-location retail hiring, especially for chains in the small-to-mid-size range.[2][7]

A practical short list would be:

- **Treegarden** — best if you care most about **predictable pricing**, unlimited users/jobs, and handling seasonal volume without plan penalties.[2][7]
- **Workable** — best if you want a mainstream ATS with **strong sourcing reach** and a **mobile application flow** for small-to-mid-size retail teams.[2]
- **JazzHR** — best if budget is the main constraint and your hiring volume is still relatively modest; the source frames it as suited to **small retailers with fewer than 40 annual hires**.[2]
- **Fountain** — best if your hiring is truly **frontline/high-volume** and you need **mobile-first apply** plus scheduling, though the source emphasizes multi-location operators and larger-volume use cases.[4]
- **Harri** — a reasonable option for **retail and hourly hiring at scale**, according to the high-volume hiring comparison.[10]

If you want the most direct recommendation: **Treegarden** for a small chain doing frequent seasonal or store-level hiring, and **Workable** if you want a more general-purpose ATS with better market familiarity.[2][7]

If you tell me your **number of locations**, **annual hires**, and whether you need **SMS/WhatsApp, interview scheduling, or payroll integrations**, I can narrow it to one best pick.


What applicant tracking system should I choose if I only hire a few people a year?

If you only hire a few people a year, choose a **simple, low-cost ATS** rather than an enterprise platform. For most small teams, **Breezy HR** or **Zoho Recruit** are the safest budget-friendly starting points, while **JazzHR** is a strong paid option if you want a cleaner core ATS without paying for advanced enterprise features.[2][1][10]

A practical way to decide is:

- **Fewer than 2 hires/year:** a spreadsheet may be enough.[3]
- **2–8 hires/year:** use a lightweight ATS such as **Breezy HR**, **Zoho Recruit**, or **JazzHR**.[3][2][10]
- **Need the easiest all-around small-business option:** **Workable** is often recommended as the best overall pick, but it is usually more than you need if hiring is very infrequent.[2][11]
- **Need the cheapest workable option:** **Breezy HR** or **Zoho Recruit**.[2][10]

If your hiring is occasional and straightforward, prioritize:
- **Easy setup**
- **Candidate tracking**
- **Job posting**
- **Basic email communication**
- **Low monthly cost**

If you want one clear recommendation without extra context: **JazzHR** if you want a paid ATS that stays simple, or **Breezy HR** if you want a free/very low-cost start.[3][10][2]


Modern alternatives to legacy applicant tracking systems for SMBs

For SMBs replacing a legacy ATS, the strongest **modern alternatives** are usually lightweight recruiting tools like **Breezy HR, Workable, JazzHR, Zoho Recruit, Recruitee, Teamtailor, Ashby, and Pinpoint**, plus broader HR suites such as **BambooHR, Rippling, Deel, and Personio** if you want ATS plus onboarding/payroll in one system.[1][2][6][10][12][17]

A practical way to choose is by what you want to improve:

- **Best budget option:** **Zoho Recruit** is repeatedly cited as low-cost, with pricing reported from about **$25–$30 per user/month** and a free tier in some listings.[1][2][12]
- **Best ease of use / quick setup:** **Breezy HR** is often recommended for small businesses on a budget and simple implementation.[6][12]
- **Best sourcing and hiring workflows:** **Workable** is highlighted for sourcing, AI matching, and out-of-box ease.[1][2][12]
- **Best collaborative hiring:** **JazzHR** is frequently described as strong for team-based hiring and customizable workflows.[1][3][12]
- **Best all-in-one HR replacement:** **BambooHR, Rippling, Deel, and Personio** combine ATS with broader HR functions like onboarding and employee management.[1][6][9][10][17]
- **Best for branded candidate experience:** **Teamtailor** is known for career sites, employer branding, and candidate chat.[5][10]
- **Best for automation and reporting at a growing SMB:** **Ashby** is positioned as strong for speed, stack consolidation, AI, and reporting.[2][14]
- **Best for more structured, high-touch recruiting:** **Pinpoint** is often placed in the premium/collaborative category, especially for teams that want stronger workflow control.[2][10][12]

If you are specifically moving off a legacy ATS, the best-fit shortlist is usually:

| Need | Good options |
|---|---|
| Lowest cost | Zoho Recruit, Breezy HR, JazzHR |
| Better hiring collaboration | JazzHR, Recruitee, Teamtailor |
| Modern automation / AI | Workable, Ashby, Zoho Recruit |
| ATS + HR suite | BambooHR, Rippling, Deel, Personio |
| Strong candidate experience | Teamtailor, Workable, Pinpoint |

A useful rule of thumb: if your legacy ATS is only doing candidate tracking, choose a **purpose-built modern ATS**; if you also want onboarding, payroll, scheduling, or employee records, choose an **all-in-one HR platform with ATS**.[6][10][17]

If you want, I can turn this into a **shortlist by company size, budget, and must-have features** for your SMB.


Best applicant tracking system for a professional services firm under 100 people

For a **professional services firm under 100 people**, the strongest all-around ATS choice is usually **Breezy HR** or **JazzHR** if you want a lightweight, easy-to-use system; **Pinpoint** is a better fit if you need a more polished, hiring-team-friendly workflow with stronger collaboration. Small-business roundups consistently place **Breezy HR** at or near the top for small teams, and multiple 2026 guides call out **JazzHR**, **Recruitee**, and **BambooHR** as strong options for firms in this size range.[6][9][1][5][3]

A practical recommendation by use case:

- **Best overall for under 100 employees:** **Breezy HR** — repeatedly ranked best for small businesses and described as a strong fit for teams around 10–100 employees.[9][19][6]
- **Best if you want simplicity and speed:** **JazzHR** — commonly recommended for startups and small teams that need self-serve setup and straightforward hiring workflows.[5][6]
- **Best if hiring is more structured or collaborative:** **Pinpoint** — scores highest in one 2026 rubric and is positioned for organizations hiring in more than one “shape,” which can suit professional services firms with varied roles.[3]
- **Best if you also want broader HR software:** **BambooHR** — identified as an HR suite with ATS, which is useful if your firm wants recruiting and core HR in one system.[1]

If you want a single default choice, I’d pick **Breezy HR** for most professional services firms under 100 people because it appears repeatedly as the best small-business ATS and is explicitly positioned for small teams.[9][19][6] If your recruiting process involves multiple hiring managers, client-facing roles, or more complex approval steps, **Pinpoint** is worth shortlisting first.[3][11]

If you want, I can also give you a **top 3 shortlist by budget** or a **comparison table for Breezy HR vs JazzHR vs Pinpoint vs BambooHR**.


What ATS has the best mobile experience for small business hiring?

For **small-business hiring with the best mobile experience**, **Workstream** is the strongest pick from these results. It is described as **mobile-first**, with **SMS/QR apply**, automated screening, and multi-location tools aimed at **frontline, hourly, and multi-site hiring**[2].

If your hiring is not hourly/frontline, the next-best mobile-friendly options are **Teamtailor** and **Pinpoint**, which are highlighted for the **best candidate experience** in 2026 roundups[16]. Those are better fits when you want a polished mobile application flow, but the results here most clearly single out **Workstream** as the most mobile-oriented ATS for small-business hiring[2][4].

A quick practical rule:
- **Best mobile experience overall for small business:** **Workstream**[2]
- **Best polished candidate experience:** **Teamtailor** or **Pinpoint**[16]
- **Best if you want simpler small-business ATS buying guides:** see small-business roundups that emphasize mobile-friendly application flow as a key requirement[1][3][4]


Which applicant tracking system is best value for money for a small company?

For a **small company**, the best **value for money** ATS is usually **Breezy HR** if you want the strongest mix of features, usability, and cost; if your top priority is the **lowest paid price**, **Manatal** is the cheaper option at **$15/user/month** on annual billing.[3][8]

A practical way to think about it is:

- **Breezy HR**: best overall value for most small businesses because it combines a free tier, an intuitive drag-and-drop pipeline, one-click posting to many job boards, video interviewing, and automation, with paid plans starting at **$157/month** and unlimited users/candidates included.[3][4][8]
- **Manatal**: best if you want the **lowest-cost paid full ATS**, starting at **$15/user/month**, but it is more budget-focused than feature-rich compared with Breezy HR.[7][8]
- **JazzHR**: often the best **budget-friendly** choice for SMBs needing a solid ATS without paying enterprise rates; one review calls it a strong option for teams on a tighter budget.[2][11][14][15]

If you want a single recommendation without further context, I’d pick **Breezy HR** for **best value for money**, and **Manatal** if your company is extremely cost-sensitive and can live with a more stripped-down setup.[3][4][8]