Which applicant tracking systems are easiest to set up for a small business?

For a **small business**, the easiest ATS to set up are usually the ones marketed for **simple workflows, low implementation effort, and minimal onboarding**. Based on the results you provided, the strongest “easy setup” options are **JuggleHire**, **Manatal**, **Ninja Gig**, **Breezy HR**, **JazzHR**, **Zoho Recruit**, and **Workable**.[2][4][6][7][8][11][19]

- **JuggleHire** — described as taking about **10 minutes** to set up and “as easy to set up as Google Forms,” making it the clearest fit if you want the fastest launch.[6]
- **Manatal** — says setup takes about **15 minutes** and emphasizes a simple interface for small teams without dedicated HR or IT support.[11]
- **Ninja Gig** — a video result says it was set up in **seconds** and calls it “super simple” and “easy to set up.”[7]
- **Breezy HR** — repeatedly positioned as a strong small-business choice with a **free plan** and straightforward setup for smaller teams.[5][8]
- **JazzHR** — listed as best for **small and mid-sized businesses**, which usually signals relatively light setup and usability for SMBs.[5][19]
- **Zoho Recruit** — described as **affordable** and **easy to use**, making it a practical low-complexity option for small businesses.[2][9][17]
- **Workable** — one source says its implementation process is a major strength and that most small businesses can implement it **relatively quickly** without extensive consulting.[2]

If you want the **easiest overall setup**, the results point most strongly to **JuggleHire**, **Manatal**, and **Ninja Gig**.[6][7][11] If you want the **best balance of ease and established SMB features**, **Breezy HR**, **JazzHR**, and **Zoho Recruit** are the most consistently supported choices.[2][5][8][9][19]

A practical way to choose:
- Pick **JuggleHire** if you want the **fastest, simplest setup**.[6]
- Pick **Manatal** if you want **easy setup plus AI features**.[11][15]
- Pick **Breezy HR** if you want a **budget-friendly SMB ATS** with a low-friction start.[5][8]
- Pick **Zoho Recruit** if you want **ease of use at a lower cost**.[2][9]
- Pick **Workable** if you want an ATS that is still fairly easy to implement but more robust.[2]

If you want, I can turn this into a **top 5 ranked list by ease of setup, price, and features** for your exact team size.


For a **growing tech startup**, **Ashby** is the strongest overall pick if you care about analytics, structured hiring, and scaling recruiting operations. Multiple 2026 startup-focused guides describe Ashby as the best fit for venture-backed or fast-growing tech teams, while noting its stronger analytics and modern product velocity compared with older ATS options.[1][2][6][16]

If your startup is earlier-stage or more budget-sensitive, the better choice can shift:

- **Breezy HR** is often recommended for most startups because it is simpler, easier to adopt, and has a free tier plus flat pricing that does not scale per seat.[2][5][15]
- **Workable** is a solid all-around option for small businesses and growth-stage teams that want a straightforward setup and broad functionality.[3][15]
- **Greenhouse** is usually better once you have a more mature recruiting function and want enterprise-grade process control, but it is less startup-friendly on cost and complexity.[3][11][16]

A practical rule from the results is:
- **Pre-seed to Series A:** Breezy HR or Manatal for simplicity and price.[3][5][11]
- **Growth-stage tech startup:** **Ashby** for analytics and scaling recruiting workflows.[1][2][6][16]
- **Series B+ or heavier recruiting ops:** Ashby, Greenhouse, or Lever.[3][11][16]

If you want the shortest answer: **choose Ashby if you’re a tech startup that is actively growing and expects hiring complexity to rise soon; choose Breezy HR if you want the easiest and most affordable setup.**[1][2][5][16]


We need an ATS with a free plan. What are the options?

If you need an **ATS with a free plan**, the main options in 2026 are **Zoho Recruit**, **Breezy HR**, **Dover**, **OpenCATS**, **Freshteam**, **HubSpot CRM** (used as a lightweight ATS), **Loxo**, and **MightyRecruiter**.[1][2][4][10]

Here’s the practical breakdown:

| Tool | Free plan type | Notable limits / notes |
|---|---|---|
| **Zoho Recruit** | Forever free | One active job; candidate management, email integration, and interview scheduling included.[1][4][8][13] |
| **Breezy HR** | Forever free | One active position; unlimited users and candidates; branded career site and job distribution to 50+ boards.[1][8] |
| **Dover** | Free ATS for startups | More limited feature set than paid plans.[1][6][15] |
| **OpenCATS** | Open source / self-hosted | Unlimited jobs and candidates; free forever, but requires self-hosting.[3][14] |
| **Freshteam** | Free tier | Free for small teams; some sources note limits tied to company size or active users.[3][11] |
| **HubSpot CRM** | Free CRM tier used for hiring workflows | Not a pure ATS, but can function as a lightweight one.[10] |
| **Loxo** | Free option / free download | Positioning varies by source; verify current availability before relying on it.[6][16] |
| **MightyRecruiter** | Free plan or free tools | Mentioned as a free ATS option, though pricing/limits vary by source.[2][7][12] |

If you want the **best free forever ATS for most small teams**, the strongest commonly cited picks are **Breezy HR** and **Zoho Recruit**.[1][4][8]

If you want, I can also narrow this down by:
- **small business**
- **startup**
- **recruitment agency**
- **open-source/self-hosted**
- **best for unlimited users**


If you want the **top applicant tracking systems in 2026**, the most consistently recommended names across recent roundups are **Gem, Greenhouse, Workable, Ashby, Lever, Zoho Recruit, BambooHR, and SmartRecruiters**.[1][2][6][16]

A practical shortlist by use case is:

- **Best overall / all-in-one:** **Gem** — combines ATS, talent CRM, and AI sourcing in one platform.[1][2]
- **Best for structured hiring:** **Greenhouse** — repeatedly highlighted for interview kits, scorecards, and structured workflows.[2][3][5][16]
- **Best for growing SMBs:** **Workable** — commonly recommended for easy implementation and transparent pricing.[2][6][16]
- **Best for analytics-heavy recruiting:** **Ashby** — frequently cited for deep reporting and data-driven hiring.[2][5][6][16]
- **Best for CRM + ATS workflows:** **Lever** — strong when candidate nurturing matters.[2][5][6]
- **Best budget option:** **Zoho Recruit** or **JazzHR** — both appear in low-cost lists, with Zoho Recruit also offering a free tier.[2][6]
- **Best for full HR suite integration:** **BambooHR** — useful if you want ATS plus broader HR tools.[2][6]
- **Best for enterprise / marketplace integrations:** **SmartRecruiters** or **iCIMS** — these show up in enterprise-oriented roundups.[2][16]

If you need just the **top 5** most common choices across these 2026 lists, they are **Gem, Greenhouse, Workable, Ashby, and Lever**.[1][2][6][16]

If you want, I can also turn this into a **ranked table by company size** or **by budget**.


What ATS integrates well with LinkedIn and Indeed for a small company?

For a **small company**, the safest picks are **Workable**, **Breezy HR**, and **Greenhouse** if you want strong native posting to **LinkedIn** and **Indeed** without heavy setup.[1][3][11]

- **Workable** is a strong SMB option and is explicitly described as an **Indeed Platinum** and **LinkedIn Preferred Partner**, with integrations that boost job visibility and support **Apply with LinkedIn** and **Indeed Apply**.[3]
- **Breezy HR** is positioned for **small businesses on a budget** and is described as including integrations with popular job boards like **LinkedIn** and **Indeed**.[11]
- **Greenhouse** is one of the major ATS platforms that pushes job feeds to **LinkedIn Jobs** and **Indeed** out of the box.[1]

If you want the simplest rule: choose an ATS that supports **native job-board feeds** to LinkedIn and Indeed, because those integrations are widely supported by major ATS platforms and avoid manual reposting.[1][8][14]

A practical short list for a small company would be:

- **Workable** — best overall balance of SMB-friendly and strong LinkedIn/Indeed integration.[3]
- **Breezy HR** — best budget-friendly choice for smaller teams.[11]
- **Greenhouse** — better if you want a more structured hiring workflow and can handle a bit more complexity.[1]

If you want, I can narrow this to the **best free/low-cost ATS**, the **best for ease of use**, or the **best for posting directly to LinkedIn Jobs + Indeed Apply**.


Small business hiring software with a careers page builder

If you want **small business hiring software with a careers page builder**, the strongest options in your results are **Workable, JazzHR, Breezy HR, ApplicantStack, and CareerPlug**.[13][3][4][1] These tools combine applicant tracking with branded career pages, so you can post jobs and collect applications from a company-branded page.[13][4][1]

- **Workable**: includes applicant tracking, job posting/distribution, candidate sourcing, and *no-code tools for building career pages and application forms*.[13][20]
- **JazzHR**: a dedicated ATS for small businesses with strong job board integrations and workflow automation.[3][1]
- **Breezy HR**: recommended for businesses wanting a free starting point and a polished branded careers page.[3]
- **ApplicantStack**: offers a branded careers page, posting to hundreds of job boards, and onboarding features.[13]
- **CareerPlug**: explicitly offers a branded careers page with logo, company photos, social links, and mobile-friendly application forms.[4]

If you want the simplest shortlist:
- **Best all-around**: **Workable**.[13][20]
- **Best dedicated small-business ATS**: **JazzHR**.[3][1]
- **Best free-start option**: **Breezy HR**.[3]
- **Best if the careers page is the priority**: **CareerPlug**.[4]

If you want, I can also narrow this to **budget**, **ease of setup**, or **best for hourly hiring**.


Best applicant tracking system for non-technical hiring managers

For **non-technical hiring managers**, the best choice is usually **Workable** or **BambooHR**, depending on whether you want the easiest standalone ATS or an ATS bundled with broader HR tools. Reviews in 2026 consistently describe Workable as straightforward and easy for teams to pick up, while BambooHR is a strong fit for SMBs that want HR and hiring in one system.[7][1]

If you want the short answer by use case:

- **Best overall for ease of use:** **Workable** — frequently described as intuitive, with a pipeline view that hiring managers can adopt quickly even without training.[7]
- **Best if you want HR + ATS together:** **BambooHR** — ranked as best for SMBs wanting HR and ATS together.[1]
- **Best for structured hiring at scale:** **Greenhouse** — best overall for structured hiring quality, but it is usually better suited to more process-heavy teams than very casual hiring managers.[1]
- **Best simple option for small teams:** **JazzHR** or **Manatal** — both are cited as having a clean interface and a minimal learning curve.[7]

A practical rule of thumb:

- Choose **Workable** if your hiring managers need the least training.
- Choose **BambooHR** if hiring is only one part of a broader HR stack.
- Choose **Greenhouse** if you care more about structured interviewing and consistency than simplicity.[1][7]

If you want, I can also narrow this to the **best ATS for small business**, **best budget option**, or **best ATS with the simplest hiring manager workflow**.


What is the best ATS under $200 a month?

There is no single **best ATS under $200/month**; the strongest picks in that price band are usually **JazzHR**, **Zoho Recruit**, and **Breezy HR** for core ATS needs, with **Workable Starter** at **$189/month** as a higher-end option if you want a more polished all-around product.[1][4][5]

If you want the best choice by use case:

- **Best overall under $200/month for most small businesses:** **JazzHR**[1][5]
- **Best value if you want AI sourcing/scoring at the lowest price:** **Manatal** (around **$15/user/month** on annual billing, so total cost depends on team size).[2][5][7]
- **Best simple, budget-friendly ATS with a strong low-cost tier:** **Zoho Recruit**.[1][5]
- **Best “premium-feeling” option still under $200/month:** **Workable Starter** at **$189/month**.[4]
- **Best free option:** **Dover**, which offers a free ATS with unlimited jobs and users.[9]

If you want one practical recommendation: **JazzHR** is the safest “best under $200/month” pick for a typical small team, while **Manatal** is the best value if AI sourcing is important.[1][2][5]


Recommend recruiting software for a 75-person manufacturing company.

For a **75-person manufacturing company**, I’d recommend starting with **uRecruits**, **FactoryFix**, or **JazzHR** depending on whether you need manufacturing-specific workflows, blue-collar sourcing, or a simpler general ATS.[1][4][10]

- **uRecruits** — Best if you want a platform built for factory hiring, with trade-skills resume parsing, background screening workflows, skills assessments, mobile career pages, and job distribution across 22,000+ boards.[1]
- **FactoryFix** — Best if your biggest need is reaching industrial and skilled-trades candidates through a mobile-first, manufacturing-focused platform.[4]
- **JazzHR** — Best if you want a smaller-company ATS that is easier to adopt and more general-purpose; it is specifically recommended in one manufacturing-focused guide for small businesses in the 25–100 employee range.[10]

A practical short list for your size would be:

- **Best overall for manufacturing hiring:** uRecruits[1]
- **Best for candidate sourcing in industrial roles:** FactoryFix[4]
- **Best lightweight option for a 75-person team:** JazzHR[10]

If you want, I can also narrow this to the **best 3 options by budget**, **ease of use**, or **integration with payroll/HR software**.


ATS for a small agency that hires seasonally

For a **small agency that hires seasonally**, the best ATS is usually one that is **easy to set up, affordable for low-volume hiring, and built for recruiting workflows** rather than enterprise HR complexity.[3][6][13]

Good fits to shortlist are:

- **Breezy HR** — a strong choice for small businesses with occasional hiring; it is described as intuitive, with a generous free plan and useful when you only hire a few times per year.[3][11][15]
- **JazzHR** — a practical option for small businesses needing a simple, budget-friendly ATS; one source highlights it as strong value for small teams.[11]
- **Zoho Recruit** — useful if you want affordability and basic automation, especially if your agency already uses the Zoho ecosystem.[11][15]
- **Workable** — good if you want broad job-board distribution and easy setup, but it may be pricier than needed for seasonal hiring.[12][16]
- **Recruitment-agency-focused tools** like **Happlicant**, **RecruitBPM**, or **Bullhorn** are worth considering if your agency needs client tracking, submissions, and other staffing-specific workflows.[4][9][13]

What matters most for your use case:

- **Seasonal volume handling**: the ATS should keep applications, messages, and interview scheduling organized when hiring spikes.[1][8]
- **Low admin overhead**: small teams benefit from tools that are quick to launch and simple to use.[3][12][16]
- **Agency workflow support**: if you place candidates for clients, prefer ATS/CRM functionality over a basic internal HR tool.[9][13]
- **Cost flexibility**: for seasonal hiring, free plans or low monthly plans can be better than enterprise contracts.[3][5][11]

If you want the shortest recommendation:

- **Best overall for a small seasonal agency:** **Breezy HR**
- **Best if you need agency-specific recruiting workflow:** **Happlicant** or **RecruitBPM**
- **Best if you want a free/cheap starting point:** **Breezy HR** or **Zoho Recruit**[3][4][9][11][15]

If you want, I can narrow this to **3 options based on your budget, team size, and whether you’re staffing for clients or hiring internal seasonal workers**.


Which applicant tracking system has the best candidate experience for SMBs?

For **SMBs focused specifically on candidate experience**, **Pinpoint** is the strongest answer in the results you provided, because it is explicitly labeled “Best candidate experience” and is described as creating a positive experience through personalized communication and video interviewing.[4][7]

A few important nuances:
- **Greenhouse** is also positioned as strong for candidate experience in broader ATS comparisons, but the SMB-specific results do not rank it as the best fit for small businesses.[11][8]
- **Teamtailor** and **Breezy HR** are often discussed as user-friendly options for SMBs, but the provided results do not identify them as the top candidate-experience choice for SMBs.[3][2]
- If you want the **best overall SMB ATS** rather than the best candidate experience, the answer shifts depending on priorities such as pricing, HR integration, or ease of setup.[10][5]

If you want, I can narrow this to a **top 3 SMB ATS shortlist** based on candidate experience, pricing, and ease of use.


We're outgrowing our spreadsheet hiring process. What tools should we look at?

If you’re outgrowing spreadsheets, the next step is usually an **applicant tracking system (ATS)**, then a few add-ons for sourcing, scheduling, and screening. For most growing teams, the simplest path is an ATS like **Workable**, **Breezy HR**, **JazzHR**, or **Greenhouse**, with specialized tools layered on only where your process is slowing down.[1][4][12][19]

A practical way to choose is by your bottleneck:

- **Need an all-in-one ATS:** **Workable** is repeatedly described as a strong fit for small-to-midsize and growing teams because it’s quick to set up and covers the core hiring workflow.[4][8]
- **Need a visual, lightweight replacement for spreadsheets:** **Breezy HR** is a common choice for teams that want a simpler pipeline and collaborative hiring.[1][16]
- **Need a low-cost, guided ATS:** **JazzHR** is positioned as a budget-friendly option for small teams that still want a real hiring pipeline.[1]
- **Need more structured, scalable hiring:** **Greenhouse** is often recommended for teams that want consistency, fairness, and more process discipline as hiring grows.[4]
- **Need sourcing and outreach automation:** tools like **Pin**, **Gem**, or **Fetcher** focus on candidate sourcing and outreach rather than replacing the ATS.[2][15][9]
- **Need screening at volume:** **Truffle** and **Sapia.ai** are aimed at high-volume or bulk hiring, especially when first-round screening is a bottleneck.[1][8]
- **Need scheduling, assessments, or video interviews:** add tools like **Calendly** for scheduling, **TestGorilla** or **HackerRank/Codility** for assessments, and **Spark Hire** or **HireVue** for video interviewing.[6][5][17]

A common “grown-up spreadsheet” stack looks like this:

- **ATS:** Workable, Breezy HR, JazzHR, or Greenhouse[1][4][16]
- **Job posting / sourcing:** Indeed, LinkedIn, Pin, Gem, or Fetcher[2][9][17]
- **Scheduling:** Calendly or a more advanced scheduling tool if volume is high[6][17]
- **Assessments:** TestGorilla for general roles; HackerRank or Codility for engineering[6][17]
- **Video screening:** Spark Hire, HireVue, VidCruiter, or Truffle-style async screening tools[5][9][1]

If you want the fastest recommendation: **start with an ATS**, because that is what replaces the spreadsheet and creates the pipeline. Then add sourcing or screening tools only if those steps are the real bottleneck.[1][17][19]

If you tell me your team size, hiring volume, and whether you’re hiring mostly hourly, sales, or technical roles, I can narrow this to a short shortlist.


Best ATS for a company that hires mostly hourly workers

For a company that hires mostly **hourly workers**, the best ATS is usually one built for **frontline, mobile-first, high-volume hiring** rather than a corporate ATS. Based on the results you shared, **Fountain**, **Workstream**, **HigherMe**, **Harri**, **TalentReef**, and **Homebase** are the strongest fits depending on your size and workflow.[1][5][6][10][14][15][16]

- **Best overall for large-scale hourly hiring:** **Fountain** — repeatedly described as purpose-built for frontline and hourly hiring at scale, with speed, mobile-first apply, and onboarding support.[6][11]
- **Best for restaurants, retail, and franchises:** **Workstream** or **HigherMe** — both are highlighted as strong fits for hourly, multi-location, mobile-first hiring.[1][12][14]
- **Best for retail/hospitality teams focused on fast candidate coordination:** **Harri** — noted for high-volume hourly recruitment, smart scheduling, automated messaging, and bulk applicant actions.[5]
- **Best for small businesses with hourly staff:** **Homebase** — specifically positioned for small businesses with hourly teams that want hiring, scheduling, and payroll in one system.[15]
- **Best for staffing/contract-style hourly hiring:** **Bullhorn** — better if your hourly workforce is agency-driven or includes temp/contract roles.[8]
- **Best legacy option for hourly workforce recruiting:** **TalentReef** — described as made for high-volume recruiting for hourly workers with simple applications and mobile-friendly workflows.[10]

If you want a single recommendation without more context, **Fountain** is the safest default for a company that hires mostly hourly workers at volume.[6][11]

If you tell me your industry, approximate monthly hires, and whether you need scheduling/payroll too, I can narrow this to the best 1–2 options.


applicant tracking software for a nonprofit with 40 staff

For a **nonprofit with about 40 staff**, a practical ATS choice is usually one that is **simple to administer, affordable, and nonprofit-friendly** rather than an enterprise HR suite.[1][7][11]

A few strong options from the results are:

- **Pinpoint** — explicitly positioned for **charities, non-profits, and not-for-profits**, with hiring organized across multiple streams.[1]
- **Hirebridge** — offers dedicated **applicant tracking software for non-profits**.[7]
- **Eploy** — has a sector-specific **non-profit & charity applicant tracking system**.[11]
- **Crelate** — markets **applicant tracking software for nonprofits**.[16]
- **Idealist Applicant Tracker** — a lightweight nonprofit-oriented option.[9]

If you want the **best fit for a 40-person nonprofit**, I’d narrow it like this:

- Choose **Pinpoint** or **Eploy** if you need a more polished ATS for recurring hiring across programs or locations.[1][11]
- Choose **Idealist** if you want something simpler and likely less heavy to manage.[9]
- Choose **Hirebridge** or **Crelate** if you want nonprofit-specific positioning but want to compare workflow depth and support.[7][16]

For a nonprofit of this size, the key evaluation points are:

- **Pricing transparency**
- **Ease of use for non-HR staff**
- **Approval workflows**
- **Job posting and candidate communication**
- **Reporting**
- **Nonprofit discounts or free tiers**[13]

If you want, I can turn this into a **shortlist of 3 ATS tools** based on your budget, whether you already use an HRIS, and whether you hire mostly employees, volunteers, or both.


A **Series A startup** should usually choose **Ashby** if it wants modern analytics, strong pipeline visibility, and a system that scales beyond the first few hires.[2][4][6][8]

If the team is more process-heavy or wants a more established structured-hiring workflow, **Greenhouse** is the other top choice for Series A.[2][11]

A practical short list for Series A is:

- **Ashby** — best for **analytics-driven hiring** and lean recruiting teams.[2][4][8][9]
- **Greenhouse** — best for **structured interviews**, compliance, and more formal hiring processes.[2][11]
- **Lever** — best if you want a combined **CRM + ATS** setup for collaborative recruiting.[6][11]
- **Workable** — best if you want something simpler, faster to implement, and more budget-friendly.[3][6][16]
- **Breezy HR** — best for very early Series A teams that still value ease of use over advanced reporting.[6]

The main decision rule is:

- Choose **Ashby** if you expect to grow quickly and care about reporting, automation, and recruiter efficiency.[2][4][8][9]
- Choose **Greenhouse** if you prioritize process, structured evaluation, and hiring consistency.[2][11]
- Choose **Workable** or **Breezy HR** if you want lower complexity and faster setup.[3][6][16]

If you want, I can also give you a **Series A ATS recommendation by company size, hiring volume, and budget**.


Simple hiring software for a small business owner who does their own recruiting

For a small business owner doing their own recruiting, the best fit is usually a **simple ATS** with job posting, candidate tracking, interview scheduling, and basic automation—not an enterprise recruiting suite.[2][4][10] Among the options in your results, **Breezy HR**, **JazzHR**, and **Zoho Recruit** stand out as the most practical starting points for a solo recruiter.[14][15][17][19]

- **Breezy HR** is the strongest choice if you want the easiest setup and a free or low-friction start; it is described as simple, visual, and suitable for businesses hiring occasionally, with a free plan that supports one open role.[2][9][14][15][19]
- **JazzHR** is a good fit if you want a straightforward ATS with more “real hiring” features like resume parsing, customizable workflows, interview scheduling, candidate evaluations, and reporting.[4][14][17][19]
- **Zoho Recruit** is worth considering if cost is the top priority and you want a free plan with core ATS features.[17][19]
- **Workable** is better if you want a more feature-rich platform with sourcing and AI assistance, but it is likely more than a very small business owner needs for simple recruiting.[3][6][18]

A practical rule from the sources is to pick based on your hiring volume and whether you mainly need **inbound applicant tracking** or **proactive sourcing**.[2][7][18]

If you want the simplest recommendation:
- Choose **Breezy HR** if you hire occasionally and want the easiest interface.[14][15][19]
- Choose **JazzHR** if you hire regularly and want a cleaner dedicated ATS with stronger workflow tools.[4][14][17][19]
- Choose **Zoho Recruit** if you want the lowest-cost way to get started.[17][19]

If you want, I can narrow this to the **best free option**, **best budget paid option**, or **best option for high-volume hiring**.


Which ATS is best for collaborative hiring with a small team?

For **collaborative hiring with a small team**, **JazzHR** is the strongest single pick from these results because it is explicitly described as the **best ATS for collaborative hiring teams** and supports **unlimited users**, which fits small-team collaboration well.[3]

If you want the main alternatives by use case:
- **Recruitee** is also a strong choice when collaboration is the top priority, with multiple sources highlighting its visual pipeline and team-input workflow.[10][16][17]
- **Breezy HR** is a good option if you want collaboration plus a very simple, drag-and-drop experience and unlimited-user pricing.[10][18]
- **Workable** is a broader all-around option for small teams, but it is less specifically positioned around collaboration than JazzHR or Recruitee.[1][17]

If your team is already on **Microsoft 365**, **Recruitment Management 365** may be the best fit because it works natively inside Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint, reducing friction for a small team already using that stack.[1]

If you want, I can give you a **2-minute shortlist** based on your budget, team size, and whether you already use Microsoft 365.


Best applicant tracking system for a restaurant group

For a **restaurant group**, the best ATS depends on your size and hiring model, but the strongest restaurant-specific options are **StaffedUp, Harri, Hireology, Workstream, and HigherMe**.[1] If you run a **QSR/franchise** operation with high-volume, mobile-first hiring, **HigherMe** is the clearest fit according to one 2026 restaurant-focused review.[9]

A practical way to choose is:

- **Best overall for hospitality/hourly hiring:** **StaffedUp** or **Harri**[1]
- **Best for QSR/franchise hiring:** **HigherMe**[9]
- **Best for small to mid-size restaurant groups:** **Workstream** or **Hireology**[1]
- **Best if you want restaurant-operations integration:** **Altametrics** is also positioned as a restaurant-focused ATS option.[3]

If you want a simple recommendation:
- **Single brand or small multi-unit group:** **Workstream** or **Hireology**[1]
- **Larger group or franchise network:** **Harri** or **HigherMe**[9][4]
- **Hospitality-first recruiting workflow:** **StaffedUp**[1]

If you tell me your **number of locations**, whether you’re **QSR/full-service**, and whether you need **franchise permissions or multi-brand reporting**, I can narrow it to one best choice.


What recruiting software works well for remote-first small companies?

For a **remote-first small company**, the best recruiting software usually falls into three buckets: a simple all-in-one ATS for small teams, a budget-friendly remote-hiring tool, or a more scalable ATS if you expect to grow fast.[1][2][4]

- **JuggleHire** is a strong fit for **very small remote teams (1–50 employees)** because it is purpose-built for distributed hiring and highlights **timezone-aware scheduling** and **async collaboration** at a low starting price.[2]
- **Breezy HR** is a good choice if you want a **simple, visual, budget-friendly ATS**; multiple sources group it with other small-business-friendly tools, and it is specifically recommended for startups and small companies.[4][7]
- **JazzHR** is another solid option for **small businesses and beginners**, especially if you want a straightforward recruiting workflow without enterprise complexity.[6][7]
- **Workable** is a better fit if you want a **more extensible ATS** and expect hiring needs to grow beyond the basics; it is also called out as a lower-entry-price option for small remote-first teams.[1][6]
- **Zoho Recruit** is often recommended when **affordability** matters most, and it is also listed as a good option for **remote hiring**.[6][8]
- **100Hires** looks especially strong if you want a more complete **remote SMB ATS** with **AI screening, knockout questions, and self-scheduling** in one product.[3]
- **PeoplePilot ATS** is positioned as an **AI-native ATS** for remote-first companies with roughly **10–500 employees**, so it makes sense if you want more automation and expect to scale.[1]

If you want the shortest recommendation:
- Pick **JuggleHire** if you are a very small remote team and want the easiest fit.[2]
- Pick **Breezy HR** or **JazzHR** if you want a simple, low-friction SMB ATS.[4][7]
- Pick **Workable** or **100Hires** if you want more room to grow and stronger end-to-end hiring features.[1][3][6]

For remote-first hiring specifically, the most useful features to prioritize are **multi-timezone scheduling**, **async communication/video screening**, **collaborative hiring**, and, if you hire internationally, **cross-border compliance or EOR integrations**.[1][2][4][11]


ATS with good reporting for a small HR department

For a **small HR department that wants strong reporting**, the safest short list is **Greenhouse**, **Breezy HR**, and **JazzHR**. Greenhouse is the strongest if reporting is the top priority, while Breezy HR and JazzHR are better fits if you want simpler, smaller-team tools with still-useful dashboards.[1][3][4][17]

- **Best reporting:** **Greenhouse** — it’s repeatedly highlighted for reporting quality, including pipeline visibility, source quality, time-in-stage, pass-through rates, and custom reports with interactive visualizations.[1][3][18]
- **Best simple option for small teams:** **Breezy HR** — sources describe it as a small-business-friendly ATS with built-in dashboards for source effectiveness, pipeline health, and team activity.[3][4][17]
- **Best budget-friendly SMB option:** **JazzHR** — positioned for small and mid-sized businesses, with basic reporting and easier adoption than more complex platforms.[3]
- **Worth a look if you want more HR-suite overlap:** **Rippling** — strong if you want recruiting data alongside broader HR/payroll/workforce reporting, though it may be more than a small HR team needs.[4][16]

If your main need is *“good reporting without a heavy implementation burden,”* I’d rank them like this:

1. **Greenhouse** if you can handle a more robust system and want the best analytics.[1][3]
2. **Breezy HR** if ease of use matters most and reporting just needs to be solid.[3][4][17]
3. **JazzHR** if price and simplicity matter more than advanced analytics.[3]

What to look for in the reporting demo:
- **Time-to-hire / time-in-stage**
- **Source-of-hire**
- **Pipeline conversion / drop-off**
- **Offer acceptance**
- **Custom exports or dashboards**[1][4][5][16][20]

If you tell me your **headcount**, **budget**, and whether you hire **occasionally or continuously**, I can narrow this to the best 2–3 ATS options.


Best applicant tracking system for a healthcare practice with 60 employees

For a **healthcare practice with 60 employees**, the best fit is usually **100Hires** if you want a low-cost ATS that is explicitly positioned for **clinics, practices, and care organizations up to about 100 staff**.[2] If you want a more widely used general ATS with strong review volume and simpler self-serve setup, **JazzHR** and **ApplicantStack** are also strong contenders.[3]

- **Best overall for your size:** **100Hires** — specifically recommended for **clinics, practices, and care organizations up to ~100 staff**, with pricing starting at **$49/month billed annually**.[2]
- **Best budget option:** **ApplicantStack** — published tiers start at about **$30/month**, making it attractive if you mainly need basic hiring workflow and want to keep costs down.[3]
- **Best if multiple people will review candidates:** **JazzHR** — cited as a good fit because its **$75 plan includes unlimited users**, which helps when an owner, practice manager, and clinician all participate in hiring.[3]
- **Best if you want a healthcare-specialized enterprise product:** **HealthcareSource** — repeatedly described as purpose-built for healthcare with stronger **credentialing and compliance tracking**, but it is typically more than a 60-employee practice needs.[13]

For a 60-employee practice, the decision usually comes down to this:

- Choose **100Hires** if you want the best match on size, price, and straightforward hiring.
- Choose **JazzHR** if collaboration across several reviewers matters most.
- Choose **ApplicantStack** if lowest cost is the priority.
- Choose **HealthcareSource** only if you need deeper healthcare compliance workflows and are willing to pay for them.[2][3][13]

If you want, I can narrow this to the **best ATS for a medical, dental, behavioral health, or multi-site practice** and give you a short side-by-side comparison.


What's the easiest applicant tracking system to learn?

The **easiest applicant tracking system to learn** depends on your team, but the strongest recurring picks in the results are **Workable**, **BambooHR**, **Manatal**, and **JazzHR**.[2][3][5][9]

- **Workable** is repeatedly described as straightforward and easy for teams to pick up, with an intuitive pipeline view and a low learning curve.[2][5][7][9]
- **BambooHR** is highlighted as best for *first-time ATS users* because its interface is simple and clean, making it quick to learn.[3]
- **Manatal** is also frequently praised for a clean interface and minimal learning curve, and it can be fast to set up.[5][8]
- **JazzHR** is mentioned as straightforward for small teams running simple hiring workflows.[5][9]

If you want one best default answer, **Workable** is the safest choice for “easiest to learn” across the sources here.[2][5][7][9]
If you are completely new to ATS software and want the simplest interface, **BambooHR** is a strong alternative.[3]


Recommend an ATS that also does onboarding for a small company.

For a **small company**, the strongest simple recommendation is **Gusto** if you want **ATS + onboarding + payroll/compliance** in one user-friendly system.[11] If you want a more recruiting-focused platform that still includes onboarding, **Workable** is a solid all-in-one option for hiring, onboarding, and employee management.[1]

A few good fits by use case:

- **Gusto** — best if you want onboarding tightly connected to payroll and compliance.[11]
- **Workable** — best if you want a broader all-in-one HR platform with hiring and onboarding.[1]
- **Deel ATS** — best if you hire globally and want candidate data to flow directly into onboarding, payroll, and HRIS.[10]
- **BambooHR** — best if you want a more complete HR platform with onboarding built in.[2]

If you want the **most practical pick for a small team**, I’d start with **Gusto** unless your hiring needs are more recruiting-heavy than HR-heavy.[11]


Which applicant tracking systems have the best pricing for companies under 100 employees?

For companies **under 100 employees**, the **best pricing** usually comes from ATS tools with either a **free tier** or a **low flat monthly fee**. The strongest low-cost options in the results are **Zoho Recruit**, **Manatal**, **JazzHR**, **Breezy HR**, and **BambooHR** depending on whether you want the absolute cheapest plan or the best value for a growing team.[1][4][12][16][17][19]

- **Zoho Recruit**: **Free plan** available; paid plans start at **$25–$30 per user/month**, making it one of the cheapest entry points.[1][7][12]
- **Manatal**: Starts at **$15 per user/month** (annual billing), and is repeatedly cited as the **cheapest paid full-featured ATS** in the results.[4][12][19]
- **JazzHR**: Starts at **$39–$49/month** in the results, which is attractive for small teams that want a flat fee instead of per-user pricing.[16][19]
- **Breezy HR**: Has a **free plan**, with paid plans starting around **$157/month**; good if you need a low-friction option with unlimited users.[12][17][19]
- **BambooHR**: Starts at **$10 per employee/month** for companies over 25 employees, but has a **$250/month minimum** for 25 or fewer employees, so it is not the cheapest for very small teams but can be cost-effective as headcount grows.[1][2][4]

If you want the **cheapest overall**:
- **Free**: **Zoho Recruit** or **Breezy HR**.[1][12]
- **Cheapest paid**: **Manatal** at **$15/user/month**.[4][12][19]

If you want the **best pricing for a growing company under 100 employees**:
- **Manatal** is the best low-cost paid option if you want full ATS functionality.[4][12]
- **JazzHR** is a strong value if you prefer a predictable flat monthly fee.[16][19]
- **BambooHR** becomes more competitive if you also need **HR software**, not just recruiting.[1][4]


For a **small company**, the best ATS is usually the one that is **easy to adopt, low on admin, and priced for a lean team**.[9][6] Based on the sources you provided, the strongest short-list is **Breezy HR**, **Dover**, and **BambooHR**, with **Breezy HR** appearing most often as the top pick for small businesses.[3][5][14]

- **Best overall for small businesses:** **Breezy HR** — Venture Harbour explicitly calls it the “best ATS for small businesses,” and also names it the winner over GoHire.[3]
- **Best if you want built-in hiring support:** **Dover** — Dover says it is the best overall ATS for small businesses because it combines recruiting software with access to hiring support.[5]
- **Best if you want an HR suite with ATS included:** **BambooHR** — one review source labels it the “Best ATS for Small Business” and highlights that it is easy to adopt as you grow.[14]

If your company is **5–10 employees**, I would usually prioritize:
- **Ease of setup**
- **Simple collaboration**
- **Affordable pricing**
- **Candidate pipeline visibility**
- **Integrations with email/calendar**

If you want, I can give you a **top 3 recommendation by budget** or a **comparison table for Breezy vs Dover vs BambooHR**.


What hiring software do 20-person companies use?

For a **20-person company**, the most common choice is usually a lightweight **ATS** plus a few add-on tools for posting jobs, scheduling interviews, and testing candidates.[1][2]

The strongest patterns in the results are:

- **ATS / candidate tracking:** **Breezy HR**, **Zoho Recruit**, **Manatal**, **JazzHR**, **Workable**, or **BambooHR** are all positioned for small teams, with pricing and feature sets that fit SMB hiring.[2][5][9][12]
- **Job posting / sourcing:** **Indeed** and sometimes **LinkedIn Jobs** are used to attract applicants, often alongside the ATS.[1]
- **Interview scheduling:** **Calendly** is a common low-cost scheduling tool for small-business hiring.[1]
- **Skills assessments:** **TestGorilla** is a typical add-on when teams want structured screening.[1]

If you want the **most practical stack for a 20-person company**, the sources point to:

- **Budget / simple hiring:** **Zoho Recruit** or **Breezy HR** for ATS, plus **Indeed** and **Calendly**.[1][2]
- **All-in-one small-business HR + hiring:** **BambooHR** or **Workable** if you want hiring inside a broader HR platform.[5][9][12]
- **More structured recruiting:** **JazzHR** or **Workable** if the company is hiring regularly and needs stronger workflows.[2][12][18]

A useful rule of thumb from the results is that companies around this size usually do **not** need enterprise recruiting software; they need pipeline tracking, job distribution, interview scheduling, and basic automation rather than heavy compliance or staffing-agency features.[2][3][5]


I run a 120-person construction firm. What applicant tracking system fits us?

For a **120-person construction firm**, the best fit is usually a **mid-market ATS with strong ease of use, scheduling, and field-hiring support**—not a heavyweight enterprise suite. Based on the results, **Workable** is the safest general-purpose choice, while **Arcoro** is the strongest construction-specific option if you need trade/field hiring workflows and industry integrations.[2][12][7]

A practical shortlist:

| ATS | Best fit for your firm | Why it fits |
|---|---|---|
| **Arcoro** | Construction-focused hiring | Built for construction/logistics hiring and highlighted for affordability, ease of use, and trade-specific integrations.[2][7] |
| **Workable** | Best all-around for a 120-person company | Repeatedly identified as a strong choice for easy implementation and candidate tracking, which suits a lean HR team.[9][12] |
| **Zoho Recruit** | Budget-conscious small to mid-sized teams | Positioned as affordable with automation and multi-stakeholder hiring support.[8][12] |
| **Breezy HR** | If you want a simpler, lower-cost option | Marketed toward small businesses on a budget with a free plan.[12] |
| **Greenhouse** | If hiring process rigor and reporting matter most | Strong but typically better for more process-heavy teams; often a step up in cost/complexity.[9][12] |

If I were choosing for a **120-employee construction company**, I’d recommend this order:

1. **Arcoro** if you hire a lot of field workers, trades, or seasonal labor and want construction-specific workflows.[2][7]
2. **Workable** if you want the most balanced mix of usability, speed of rollout, and broad ATS capability.[9][12]
3. **Zoho Recruit** if price sensitivity is high and you still want solid automation.[8][12]

What to prioritize for your situation:
- **Mobile-friendly apply flow** for field candidates.
- **Job posting and scheduling automation** to reduce coordinator workload.
- **Role-based permissions** so field managers and HR can collaborate safely.
- **Integration with HR/payroll/onboarding tools** if you want one system instead of multiple point solutions.[5]

If you want, I can narrow this to **one best recommendation** based on your budget, number of recruiters, and whether you hire mostly **hourly field staff** or **office staff**.


Best ATS for high-volume retail hiring at a small chain

For a **small retail chain** doing **high-volume hiring**, the best fit is usually **Workable** or **JazzHR**, with **Workable** stronger if you need broader sourcing and a better mobile candidate experience, and **JazzHR** better if your hiring volume is modest and budget is the main constraint.[2]

- **Workable** is described as best for **small to mid-size retailers (1–20 locations)** with moderate hiring volumes, and its strengths are **volume sourcing** and a **mobile-first candidate experience**.[2]
- **JazzHR** is positioned as best for **independent retailers and small chains (1–5 stores)** with **fewer than 40 annual hires**, making it the lower-cost option for lighter volume.[2]
- If your chain is closer to a **multi-location, seasonal, or very high-volume** model, **Fountain** is a stronger specialized option because it is built for **high-volume frontline employers** in retail and emphasizes **mobile-first apply** and **onboarding**.[5][10]
- If your main pain point is **candidate engagement speed** and you are already on or moving to **Workday**, **Paradox** is highlighted as a good retail/high-volume choice.[10]
- More enterprise-oriented platforms like **MokaHR** and **iCIMS** are aimed at **medium-to-large** or **enterprise** retail hiring, so they may be more platform than a small chain needs.[1][17]

If you want a simple recommendation:
- **Best overall for a small chain with real volume:** **Workable**.[2]
- **Best budget pick for lighter hiring:** **JazzHR**.[2]
- **Best if you are truly high-volume and frontline-heavy:** **Fountain**.[5][10]

If you want, I can narrow this to the **best 3 ATS options by budget, store count, and monthly hiring volume**.


What applicant tracking system should I choose if I only hire a few people a year?

If you only hire a **few people a year**, choose a **simple, low-cost ATS** rather than an enterprise platform. The best fit is usually **Breezy HR** if you want a free or very low-cost start, or **Zoho Recruit** / **JazzHR** if you want a bit more structure without much complexity.[2][3][10]

A practical way to decide:

- **Breezy HR** — best if you want the **lightest, cheapest option** and only need basic hiring workflows for occasional openings.[2][3][9]
- **Zoho Recruit** — best if you want **budget-friendly functionality** and are okay with a more utilitarian setup.[2][10]
- **JazzHR** — best if you want **simple recruiting power** and expect to stay at low volume but still want a more complete ATS than a free tool.[1][10][20]
- **Workable** — best if you want the **smoothest all-around experience** and don’t mind paying more; several reviews call it the strongest general small-business option.[2][11]

For your use case, I would narrow it to this rule of thumb:
- **Hiring 1–10 people per year:** start with **Breezy HR** or **Zoho Recruit**.[8][9][10]
- **Hiring 5–20 people per year and want better workflows:** choose **JazzHR** or **Workable**.[10][11][20]

If you tell me your budget and whether you need things like interview scheduling, job board posting, or a branded careers page, I can recommend one specific ATS.


Modern alternatives to legacy applicant tracking systems for SMBs

Modern alternatives to legacy ATS systems for SMBs are typically **cloud-based, integrated HR/recruiting platforms** that add automation, better candidate experience, and simpler administration. The strongest SMB options in the results are **Workable, JazzHR, BambooHR, Zoho Recruit, Breezy HR, Recruitee, Teamtailor, Rippling, and Manatal**.[1][2][4][8][12][15]

- **Workable**: Good for SMBs that want strong sourcing and a relatively quick setup; it is repeatedly positioned as a modern ATS with AI sourcing and out-of-the-box ease.[1][2][12]
- **JazzHR**: A common pick for small and mid-sized businesses needing collaborative hiring, customizable workflows, and a more affordable recruiting-focused tool.[1][4][12][19]
- **BambooHR**: Best when you want ATS plus broader HR functions such as onboarding and payroll in one suite rather than a standalone legacy ATS replacement.[1][4][12][15]
- **Zoho Recruit**: Best for budget-conscious SMBs that want customization, integrations, and AI features without enterprise pricing.[2][4][12]
- **Breezy HR**: Often recommended for smaller teams that want ease of use and budget-friendly recruiting features.[7][12]
- **Recruitee**: Strong for collaborative hiring and workflow automation, especially for growing teams.[8][9]
- **Teamtailor**: A good fit if you care most about employer branding, career sites, and candidate experience.[5][8][12]
- **Rippling**: Better if you want ATS tightly connected to HR operations like onboarding and payroll, not just recruiting.[4][7][15]
- **Manatal**: Noted for SMBs that want more advanced AI-style recruiting features at a lower cost than enterprise platforms.[3]

If you are replacing a legacy ATS, the main shift is usually away from a standalone database of applicants toward a **suite** or **workflow platform** that handles sourcing, interview scheduling, collaboration, onboarding, and reporting in one place.[2][8][15]

A practical way to choose:
- **Need the cheapest modern replacement**: Zoho Recruit or Breezy HR.[2][12]
- **Need recruiting plus HR**: BambooHR or Rippling.[1][4][15]
- **Need collaborative hiring**: JazzHR or Recruitee.[1][8][12]
- **Need employer branding and candidate experience**: Teamtailor.[5][8]
- **Need stronger AI sourcing**: Workable or Manatal.[2][3][12]

If you want, I can turn this into a **shortlist by SMB type** such as retail, professional services, agencies, startups, or hourly hiring.


Best applicant tracking system for a professional services firm under 100 people

For a **professional services firm under 100 people**, the best overall fit is usually **Workable** if you want the strongest balance of ease of use, structured hiring, and fast setup without needing dedicated HR tech support.[1]

If your firm is more process-heavy and needs highly structured, collaborative hiring, **Greenhouse** is often the better choice for that style of recruiting, though it is typically a more robust system than many very small firms need.[1][19]

A practical shortlist for your size is:

- **Workable** — best all-around choice for most small professional services firms; full hiring workflow and built-in video interviewing.[1]
- **Greenhouse** — best if you want disciplined, collaborative hiring with more structure.[1][19]
- **JazzHR** — good SMB option if you want something simpler and common in small-business hiring.[1]
- **Zoho Recruit** — good if budget matters and you want built-in automation plus sourcing tools.[1][13]
- **Breezy HR** or **Recruitee** — good if you want a more lightweight SMB-focused tool.[8][9]

If you want the **single safest recommendation**, choose **Workable**.[1]

If you want the **best fit for a professional services firm specifically**, choose **Greenhouse** only if your hiring process is formal and multi-stakeholder; otherwise **Workable** is the more practical default.[1][19]


What ATS has the best mobile experience for small business hiring?

For **small business hiring with the best mobile experience**, **Workstream** is the strongest fit from the results you provided because it is explicitly described as **mobile-first**, with **SMS/QR apply** workflows and hiring tools built for frontline, high-volume, multi-location recruiting.[2]

A few important nuances:

- **Workstream** is the clearest winner if your priority is **candidate mobile experience** and text-based apply flows.[2]
- If you want a more general-purpose ATS with good mobile usability rather than a mobile-first design, **Spark Hire** is described as the **best overall pick** in one small-business roundup, but that result emphasizes adoption, pricing, and video/reference checks more than mobile-first candidate flow.[8]
- **Manatal** and other guides stress that the application flow should be **fully functional on mobile**, but they do not rank a single platform above Workstream for mobile hiring specifically.[12]

If you tell me your hiring pattern—*hourly/frontline vs. office roles, single location vs. multi-location, and whether texting candidates matters*—I can narrow this to the best overall ATS for your situation.


Which applicant tracking system is best value for money for a small company?

For a **small company**, the best **value for money** ATS is most often **AvaHR** if you want the best mix of price and features, because it has **flat pricing from $99/month** and includes **100+ job board postings** plus **candidate texting** without per-employee pricing.[2]

If your budget is the main constraint, **Breezy HR** is the best **free** option, while **Manatal** is one of the cheapest paid options at **$15/user/month** billed annually.[3][8]

A practical way to choose:

- **Best overall value:** **AvaHR** — flat pricing, strong distribution, and built-in texting.[2]
- **Best budget paid option:** **Manatal** — very low per-user cost.[3][8]
- **Best free option:** **Breezy HR** — genuine free plan.[3][8]
- **Best all-around but more expensive:** **Workable** — strong features, but higher starting cost.[6][8][9]

If you want, I can also give you a **ranked shortlist for a 5–25 person company** based on whether you care most about **price, ease of use, or scaling**.